Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 00:33

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032125-286e08
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation68,85tok/s
Prefill603,61tok/s
Time to First Token3.567,50ms
Total duration36,88s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
763of 1843 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 59 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 68,9 tok/s
-12 % vs Ø 77,9
Prefill 603,6 tok/s
-79 % vs Ø 2.847,9
Time to First Token 3.568 ms
-86 % vs Ø 24.724
Distribution in the field0 – 471 tok/s
Ø 78 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 · run-20261026-183943-a8c4f8
471,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004608-16af9b
404,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9f766a
395,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-d456e7
393,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bffb11
393,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004607-29bd16
388,9 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-1c779f
388,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-6ea089
378,6 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e8b129
377,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105335-653788
359,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning same modelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-2c4905
359,3 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-44d1e7
359,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · run-20260729-032125-286e08
68,9 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032125-286e08
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032125-286e08 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3141.7351.1575780,003.3426.68410.026Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.748 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.011 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 8.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.460 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 122,4 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.956 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 76,7 tok/s Generation, 2.234 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 966 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.791,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.706,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.651,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 896,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 527,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 262,5 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 122,4 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 76,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3141.7351.1575780,003.2986.5959.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 1.774,4 tok/s Generation, 7.792 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.722 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 6.247 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.084 ms (40 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 76,7 tok/s Generation, 2.234 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 966 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.791,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.774,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.706,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.651,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 896,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 527,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 262,5 tok/s this runIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 76,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3141.7351.1575780,002.7075.4158.122Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.774,4 tok/s Generation, 6.652 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.057 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 6.584 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.389 ms (49 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 76,7 tok/s Generation, 2.234 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 966 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.791,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.774,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.651,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 896,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 262,5 tok/s this runDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 76,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2241.6911.15962794,92.4616.51710.57314.629Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 12.469 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.051 ms (12 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 4.621 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.811 ms (52 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.791,5 tok/s this runvLLM 527,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6125.7275.9716.2156.458Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.093 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.856 ms (64 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.791,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.38
Token / kWh799.55K
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)4.34B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.