Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Magistral-Small-2509

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 00:08

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032124-203104
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation736,95tok/s
Prefill151,93tok/s
Time to First Token9.120,00ms
Total duration60,21s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
19of 29 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 36 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 737,0 tok/s
-23 % vs Ø 960,8
Prefill 151,9 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 10.710,5
Time to First Token 9.120 ms
-76 % vs Ø 38.678
Distribution in the field1 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 961 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Magistral-Small-2509

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032124-203104
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Magistral-Small-2509 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032124-203104 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mistralai--Magistral-Small-2509-GGUF/snapshots/429b90d8a8f0037241db6fab46a20b0f90859b03/Magistral-Small-2509-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Magistral-Small-2509 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Magistral-Small-2509
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mistralai--Magistral-Small-2509-GGUF/snapshots/429b90d8a8f0037241db6fab46a20b0f90859b03/Magistral-Small-2509-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Magistral-Small-2509 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9517134752380,001.6043.2074.811Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 78 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.931 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 81,4 tok/s Generation, 1.888 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.052 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 37,6 tok/s Generation, 602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.735 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 737,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 726,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 637,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 353,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 159,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 81,4 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 37,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

9517134752380,001.6043.2074.811Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 78 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.931 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 81,4 tok/s Generation, 1.888 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.052 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 37,6 tok/s Generation, 602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.735 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 737,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 726,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 637,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 353,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 159,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 81,4 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 37,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

9517134752380,001.6043.2074.811Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 661 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.873 ms (17 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 78 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.931 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 37,6 tok/s Generation, 602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.735 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 737,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 726,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 637,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 353,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 159,0 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 37,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

81377273269265102.1714.3426.514Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 5.326 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.928 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 506 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.986 ms (32 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 737,0 tok/s this runvLLM 726,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

8117747377006631.1911.2421.2921.343Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 1.267 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.503 ms (38 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 737,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.070
Token / kWh4.27M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)46.48B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Magistral-Small-2509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Magistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-25093x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.