Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-XS-2.1

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 00:01

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032123-a1af22
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1.764,99tok/s
Prefill8.542,36tok/s
Time to First Token7.776,00ms
Total duration41,57s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
4of 29 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 89 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.765,0 tok/s
+84 % vs Ø 960,8
Prefill 8.542,4 tok/s
-20 % vs Ø 10.710,5
Time to First Token 7.776 ms
-80 % vs Ø 38.678
Distribution in the field1 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 961 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Laguna-XS-2.1

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032123-a1af22
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-XS-2.1 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032123-a1af22 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--poolside--Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/1a37c0a5fb8c7a18e6106decb6be6327d1b63fa6/Laguna-XS-2.1-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF-Q4_K_M \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF-Q4_K_M
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--poolside--Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/1a37c0a5fb8c7a18e6106decb6be6327d1b63fa6/Laguna-XS-2.1-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-XS-2.1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.2641.6981.1325660,003.6787.35511.033Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.330 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 154,3 tok/s Generation, 8.941 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.080 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.765,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.757,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.629,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 986,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 319,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 154,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2641.6981.1325660,003.6787.35511.033Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.330 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 154,3 tok/s Generation, 8.941 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.080 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.765,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.757,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.629,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 986,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 319,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 154,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2311.6731.1155580,003.6747.34811.022Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.093 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.838 ms (35 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.330 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.765,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.757,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.629,9 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 986,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 319,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2641.6981.1325660,06.4907.5838.6769.770Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 154,3 tok/s Generation, 8.941 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.080 ms (2 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.444 ms (66 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.765,0 tok/s this runvLLM 154,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9411.8531.7651.6771.5886.9247.2197.5137.808Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.345 ms (68 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.765,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.029
Token / kWh10.22M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)111.32B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.