Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 23:41

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032121-305ad6
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1.007,80tok/s
Prefill7.787,11tok/s
Time to First Token2.444,00ms
Total duration20,86s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
4of 64 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 95 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.007,8 tok/s
+78 % vs Ø 566,5
Prefill 7.787,1 tok/s
-16 % vs Ø 9.241,9
Time to First Token 2.444 ms
-82 % vs Ø 13.746
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 567 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-4b8514
1.007,3 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032119-1ddf01
1.007,0 tok/s
Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140955-17e7b6
975,1 tok/s
Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140955-d94e39
967,9 tok/s
Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140955-8dd350
966,1 tok/s
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032124-ebc781
938,2 tok/s
Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-f3211a
927,1 tok/s
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032123-277335
926,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bf4219
914,3 tok/s
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032122-601ed1
910,8 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032121-305ad6
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032121-305ad6 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,004.4588.91713.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 10.797 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.446 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.773,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 897,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 274,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 263,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 118,7 tok/sCPU-only 6,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3041.7281.1525760,004.4588.91713.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 10.797 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.446 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...
★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.773,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 897,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 274,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 263,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 118,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3041.7281.1525760,004.4588.91713.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 10.797 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.446 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.773,5 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 897,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 274,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 263,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 118,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1991.6761.15463110805.47110.94216.413Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 533,5 tok/s Generation, 13.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.206 ms (5 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 2.609 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 28.271 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.773,5 tok/s this runvLLM 533,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9511.8621.7741.6851.5964.5214.7144.9065.099Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 4.810 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.058 ms (25 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.773,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 70 W
⚡ TDP 644 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)644 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 29 + Board 15 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.053
Token / kWh5.64M
Acquisition (system)EUR 15,248 full priceGPU EUR 13,000 · CPU EUR 649 · Board EUR 499 · RAM EUR 920 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 18,632
Output tokens (2 years)63.56B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (70 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.