Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 21:10

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032119-9ef362
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation108,50tok/s
Prefill2.121,02tok/s
Time to First Token85.479,50ms
Total duration563,61s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
1125of 1484 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 24 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 108,5 tok/s
-76 % vs Ø 449,0
Prefill 2.121,0 tok/s
-69 % vs Ø 6.844,8
Time to First Token 85.480 ms
+93 % vs Ø 44.343
Distribution in the field0 – 3.484 tok/s
Ø 449 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 · run-20261026-180644-063abd
3.484,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 · run-20261026-183943-bbe82c
2.867,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20261023-065752-48370d
2.412,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20261021-093815-dce558
2.263,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20261023-065758-96fe6a
2.144,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20261023-065808-332d1f
1.981,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · run-20260729-032119-9ef362
108,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032119-9ef362
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032119-9ef362 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9417064712350,003.5517.10210.654Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.595 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.723 ms (7 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 536,7 tok/s Generation, 3.956 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.055 ms (27 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 4.022 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.336 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 - 265,9 tok/s Generation, 5.497 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.725 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 206,3 tok/s Generation, 2.695 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.967 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 162,7 tok/s Generation, 2.720 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.042 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.715 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.815 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 138,4 tok/s Generation, 920 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.130 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 725,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 620,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 569,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 536,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 331,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 265,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 206,3 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 162,7 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 152,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 138,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 108,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 23,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 8,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

9417064712350,003.3986.79610.193Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 709,2 tok/s Generation, 6.950 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.028 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 536,7 tok/s Generation, 3.513 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.931 ms (42 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 265,9 tok/s Generation, 4.256 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.669 ms (7 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 162,7 tok/s Generation, 3.316 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.929 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 145,9 tok/s Generation, 2.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.155 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.512 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.591 ms (21 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 725,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 709,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 620,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 569,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 536,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 331,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 265,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 162,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 152,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 145,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 8,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

9417064712350,003.3346.66810.003Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 709,2 tok/s Generation, 7.667 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.781 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 4.344 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.926 ms (51 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) - 265,9 tok/s Generation, 5.497 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.725 ms (4 Laufe)Micro-Star Internatio...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 4.553 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.826 ms (2 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 162,7 tok/s Generation, 3.316 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.929 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 141,8 tok/s Generation, 2.602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.262 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (2 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.589 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.786 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 725,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 709,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 569,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 331,6 tok/sMicro-Star International Co., Ltd. B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) 265,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 247,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 162,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 152,1 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 141,8 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 23,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 8,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

89469048728379,69623.3475.7328.117Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 6.867 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.232 ms (13 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 2.212 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.889 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 645,1 tok/s Generation, 3.489 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.968 ms (85 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 725,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 645,1 tok/s this rununbekannt 247,7 tok/s

DRVby driver

9417064712350,001.6313.2624.894Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 3.950 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.860 ms (100 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 29,4 tok/s Generation, 1.380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.259 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericROCm 7.2.0 - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (1 Lauf)ROCm 7.2.0
unbekannt 725,6 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 29,4 tok/sROCm 7.2.0 8,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.24
Token / kWh1.26M
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)6.84B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.