Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-XS-2.1

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 13:50

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-140956-c96921
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation198,34tok/s
Prefill3.832,82tok/s
Time to First Token716,50ms
Total duration11,76s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
11of 112 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 91 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 198,3 tok/s
+179 % vs Ø 71,1
Prefill 3.832,8 tok/s
+78 % vs Ø 2.158,0
Time to First Token 717 ms
-99 % vs Ø 127.988
Distribution in the field1 – 246 tok/s
Ø 71 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 92 GB
Mainboard: Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Laguna-XS-2.1

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-140956-c96921
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-XS-2.1 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-140956-c96921 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--poolside--Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/1a37c0a5fb8c7a18e6106decb6be6327d1b63fa6/Laguna-XS-2.1-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF-Q4_K_M \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF-Q4_K_M
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--poolside--Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/1a37c0a5fb8c7a18e6106decb6be6327d1b63fa6/Laguna-XS-2.1-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-XS-2.1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.2641.6981.1325660,006.29112.58318.874Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 15.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.448 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 154,3 tok/s Generation, 2.121 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.550 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.765,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.757,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.629,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 986,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 836,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 319,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 154,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2311.6731.1155580,004.6309.25913.889Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 11.399 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.107 ms (43 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.765,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.757,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.629,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 986,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 836,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 319,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2311.6731.1155580,004.2178.43512.652Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 10.402 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.497 ms (76 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.765,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.757,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.629,9 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 986,1 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 319,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2891.7171.1455720,007.78115.56223.343Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 19.361 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.004 ms (21 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 26,9 tok/s Generation, 3.698 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 748 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 5.989 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.669 ms (96 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.765,0 tok/s this runvLLM 836,4 tok/sunbekannt 26,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.2891.7171.1455720,02.3504.8127.2759.737Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 8.389 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.216 ms (117 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 26,9 tok/s Generation, 3.698 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 748 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.765,0 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 26,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.20
Token / kWh1.50M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)12.51B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.