Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B

Performance benchmark · measured on 27.07.2026 08:48

Benchmark-IDrun-20260727-090153-aeee69
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense4BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation676,42tok/s
Prefill5.366,97tok/s
Time to First Token3.579,00ms
Total duration31,03s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
5of 76 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 95 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 676,4 tok/s
+310 % vs Ø 164,9
Prefill 5.367,0 tok/s
+161 % vs Ø 2.052,4
Time to First Token 3.579 ms
-94 % vs Ø 56.332
Distribution in the field2 – 974 tok/s
Ø 165 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Nemotron-3-Nano-4B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260727-090153-aeee69
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-4B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260727-090153-aeee69 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/86e3ddc0b34d94852cae725ade1b9b015b516f38/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/86e3ddc0b34d94852cae725ade1b9b015b516f38/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.8122.1091.4067030,005.89311.78617.679Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 7.627 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.077 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 14.412 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.383 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 667,0 tok/s Generation, 3.839 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.280 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.062 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.388 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.937,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.878,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 1.485,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.197,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 992,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 667,0 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 367,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 125,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.8362.1271.4187090,003.9677.93411.900Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 7.627 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.077 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 9.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.063 ms (22 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.395 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.754 ms (9 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 8,0 tok/s Generation, 63 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 139.289 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.182,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.937,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.878,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 1.485,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.197,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 992,1 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 367,8 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 125,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.8362.1271.4187090,003.6787.35611.034Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 8.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.715 ms (34 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.395 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.754 ms (9 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 8,0 tok/s Generation, 63 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 139.289 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.182,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.937,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.878,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.197,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 992,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 367,8 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 125,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.5402.1871.8341.4811.12709.62719.25328.880Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 23.938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 583 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 4.463 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.921 ms (58 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 2.182,7 tok/s this runvLLM 1.485,1 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.7642.0731.3826910,01.8683.8125.7567.701Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 6.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.605 ms (58 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 367,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.038
Token / kWh7.86M
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)42.66B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiNemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.