# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-E4B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260727-090152-82df54 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF/snapshots/bfc15c382204943c3a8fff0c750b94ae2364d7a3/gemma-4-E4B-it-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias gemma-4-E4B-it \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	gemma-4-E4B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF/snapshots/bfc15c382204943c3a8fff0c750b94ae2364d7a3/gemma-4-E4B-it-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

gemma-4-E4B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.758,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.606,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.423,3 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.082,4 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 983,7 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 488,2 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 474,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 428,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 133,7 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 97,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.758,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.606,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.423,3 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.082,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 983,7 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 488,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 474,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 428,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 346,3 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 133,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.758,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.606,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.423,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.082,4 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 983,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 488,2 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 474,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 346,3 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 133,7 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 97,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.758,6 tok/s this runvLLM 1.022,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.758,6 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 488,2 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 474,8 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 310 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.16

Token / kWh1.92M

Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629

Output tokens (2 years)10.41B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	gemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti	gemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	gemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	gemma-4-E4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · this run 165 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 248 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 247 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 223 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.