Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 22.07.2026 23:03

Benchmark-IDrun-20260723-015519-40036d
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation6,64tok/s
Prefill72,76tok/s
Time to First Token33.547,50ms
Total duration352,27s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
1333of 1549 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 14 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 6,6 tok/s
-92 % vs Ø 79,0
Prefill 72,8 tok/s
-97 % vs Ø 2.837,1
Time to First Token 33.548 ms
+24 % vs Ø 26.963
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · 6 GB VRAM
CPU: 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz
RAM: 504 GB
Mainboard: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260723-015519-40036d
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260723-015519-40036d # GPU : 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 # CPU : 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz # RAM : 504 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /opt/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /opt/models/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -a Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8080 \ --numa distribute \ -t 64 \ -tb 64 \ -c 8192 \ --parallel 4
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./opt/models/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
NUMA?NUMA-Optimierung fuer Multi-Socket-CPUs: distribute/isolate/numactl. Verbessert die Speicherlokalitaet.distribute
Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer die Token-Generierung (Decode).64
Batch-Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer Prompt-Verarbeitung und Batch (Prefill).64
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
Parallel?Anzahl paralleler Slots/Sequenzen, die der Server gleichzeitig bedient. Der Kontext wird auf die Slots aufgeteilt.4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 751,7 tok/s Generation, 14.399 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.684 ms (36 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 258,3 tok/s Generation, 4.982 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.607 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 254,6 tok/s Generation, 4.711 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.915 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 155,8 tok/s Generation, 1.078 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.667 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 91,4 tok/s Generation, 2.676 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 39.171 ms (25 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.670,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.521,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 930,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 751,7 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 258,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 254,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,8 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 91,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 8,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 751,7 tok/s Generation, 9.595 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.048 ms (61 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 258,3 tok/s Generation, 3.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.154 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.683,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.670,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.521,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 930,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 751,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 258,3 tok/s★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,5 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 9.721 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.308 ms (70 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 258,3 tok/s Generation, 3.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.154 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.683,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.670,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.521,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 930,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 258,3 tok/s★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,5 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2.1711.6281.0855430,01.0626.90212.74218.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 906,0 tok/s Generation, 15.577 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.356 ms (35 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 91,4 tok/s Generation, 4.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.364 ms (8 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 6.274 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.535 ms (63 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.683,8 tok/s this runvLLM 906,0 tok/sunbekannt 91,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1711.6281.0855430,02.4975.3878.27711.167Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 9.596 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.257 ms (98 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 91,4 tok/s Generation, 4.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.364 ms (8 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.683,8 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 91,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 55 W
⚡ TDP 359 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)359 W estimated (TDP)GPU 320 + CPU 29 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 4.50
Token / kWh66.63K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,425 partial priceGPU EUR 220 · CPU EUR 39 · RAM EUR 2,016 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 4,311
Output tokens (2 years)418.80M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (55 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25072x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.