Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaCohere

North-Mini-Code-1.0

Performance benchmark · measured on 22.07.2026 21:13

Benchmark-IDrun-20260723-015519-0ea755
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation3,16tok/s
Prefill108,69tok/s
Time to First Token186.084,00ms
Total duration600,00s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
1163of 1195 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 3 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 3,2 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 454,8
Prefill 108,7 tok/s
-98 % vs Ø 6.592,6
Time to First Token 186.084 ms
+295 % vs Ø 47.153
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 455 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
North-Mini-Code-1.0 this run2× NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · run-20260723-015519-0ea755
3,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · 6 GB VRAM
CPU: 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz
RAM: 504 GB
Mainboard: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: North-Mini-Code-1.0

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260723-015519-0ea755
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : North-Mini-Code-1.0 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260723-015519-0ea755 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 # CPU : 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz # RAM : 504 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /opt/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /opt/models/North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -a North-Mini-Code-1.0 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8080 \ --numa distribute \ -t 64 \ -tb 64 \ -c 8192 \ --parallel 4
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.North-Mini-Code-1.0
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./opt/models/North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q4_K_M.gguf
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.North-Mini-Code-1.0
NUMA?NUMA-Optimierung fuer Multi-Socket-CPUs: distribute/isolate/numactl. Verbessert die Speicherlokalitaet.distribute
Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer die Token-Generierung (Decode).64
Batch-Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer Prompt-Verarbeitung und Batch (Prefill).64
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
Parallel?Anzahl paralleler Slots/Sequenzen, die der Server gleichzeitig bedient. Der Kontext wird auf die Slots aufgeteilt.4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

North-Mini-Code-1.0 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1061.5801.0535270,005.85511.71017.566Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 14.179 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.659 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 276,9 tok/s Generation, 2.774 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.679 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 87,3 tok/s Generation, 502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 82.917 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.621,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.557,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.492,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 939,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 648,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 276,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 169,0 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 131,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 87,3 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 5,1 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2.1061.5801.0535270,004.4428.88413.326Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 10.760 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.973 ms (40 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 276,9 tok/s Generation, 2.146 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.071 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.621,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.557,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.492,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 939,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 648,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 276,9 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 131,9 tok/s★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 5,1 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2.1061.5801.0535270,004.2308.46012.689Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 10.246 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.709 ms (52 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 276,9 tok/s Generation, 2.146 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.071 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.621,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.557,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.492,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 939,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 276,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 131,9 tok/s★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 5,1 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

1.9781.5561.1357132926168.20415.79123.379Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 19.505 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 642 ms (18 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.489 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.391 ms (56 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.621,0 tok/s this runvLLM 648,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4597.6537.9798.3058.630Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 8.142 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.371 ms (74 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.621,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 55 W
⚡ TDP 359 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)359 W estimated (TDP)GPU 320 + CPU 29 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 9.46
Token / kWh31.71K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,425 partial priceGPU EUR 220 · CPU EUR 39 · RAM EUR 2,016 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 4,311
Output tokens (2 years)199.31M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (55 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

North-Mini-Code-1.02x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060North-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090North-Mini-Code-1.03x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.