Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.07.2026 15:46

Benchmark-IDrun-20260722-165907-94e27c
Dense119BRuntime: godclawQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation58,52tok/s
Prefill2.052,52tok/s
Time to First Token1.304,00ms
Total duration37,61s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
446of 1161 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 62 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 58,5 tok/s
-21 % vs Ø 74,3
Prefill 2.052,5 tok/s
-12 % vs Ø 2.324,7
Time to First Token 1.304 ms
-96 % vs Ø 35.657
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 74 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: 32x AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: godclaw
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Operating system: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS (Kernel 7.0.0-27-generic)
Driver: AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
Model: Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603

Anmerkung

llama.cpp . 3 GPU . GGUF (unsloth/Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603-GGUF)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260722-165907-94e27c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 # Run-ID : run-20260722-165907-94e27c # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : 32x AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ cat benchmark.conf Konfigurationspfad /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603-GGUF/Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf Engine llamacpp Modellalias Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 Kontextlaenge 8192 GPU-Layer 999 Host 0.0.0.0 Port 8000 Split-Mode layer
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603-GGUF/Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603
Host?Netzwerk-Interface, an das der HTTP-Server bindet, z.B. 0.0.0.0 fuer alle Interfaces.0.0.0.0
Port?TCP-Port des HTTP-Servers.8000
Split-Mode?Verteilung ueber mehrere GPUs: none (nur eine GPU), layer (Layer aufteilen) oder row (Tensoren zeilenweise).layer

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.2439326223110,002.6185.2367.854Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 959,6 tok/s Generation, 6.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.653 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 62,3 tok/s Generation, 213 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 120.533 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 258 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.712 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 21,7 tok/s Generation, 198 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 150.089 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.602 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 959,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 62,3 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 58,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 58,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 21,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.2439326223110,002.6185.2367.854Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 959,6 tok/s Generation, 6.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.653 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 62,3 tok/s Generation, 213 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 120.533 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 258 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.712 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 21,7 tok/s Generation, 198 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 150.089 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.602 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 959,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 62,3 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 58,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 58,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 21,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.2439326223110,002.6185.2367.854Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 959,6 tok/s Generation, 6.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.653 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 62,3 tok/s Generation, 213 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 120.533 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 258 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.712 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 21,7 tok/s Generation, 198 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 150.089 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.602 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 959,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 62,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 58,5 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 58,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 21,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.2469356233120,008291.6582.487Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 959,6 tok/s Generation, 1.038 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 116.027 ms (24 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 2.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.304 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntvLLM - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 325 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.900 ms (1 Lauf)vLLM
llama.cpp 959,6 tok/sunbekannt 58,5 tok/svLLM 5,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.2369276183090,06991.2541.8092.363Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 959,6 tok/s Generation, 1.010 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 111.622 ms (25 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 58,5 tok/s Generation, 2.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.304 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 959,6 tok/s★ AMD 7.0.0-27-generic 58,5 tok/s this run
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 125 W
⚡ TDP 971 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.38
Token / kWh216.96K
Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778
Output tokens (2 years)3.69B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-4-119B-26033x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMistral-Small-4-119B-26033x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.